<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor a good choice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urbanagora.com/2009/06/sotomayor-a-good-choice.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urbanagora.com/2009/06/sotomayor-a-good-choice.html</link>
	<description>An exchange of ideas from thinkers spanning the spectrum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:26:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanagora.com/2009/06/sotomayor-a-good-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-10600</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanagora.com/?p=2407#comment-10600</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t your typing mistake; it was mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t your typing mistake; it was mine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanagora.com/2009/06/sotomayor-a-good-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-10583</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanagora.com/?p=2407#comment-10583</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the typing mistake, ha. Thanks for reading!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the typing mistake, ha. Thanks for reading!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanagora.com/2009/06/sotomayor-a-good-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-10581</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanagora.com/?p=2407#comment-10581</guid>
		<description>And that&#039;s Stanford, not &quot;Standford.&quot;  No clue how that extra character ended up in there. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s Stanford, not &#8220;Standford.&#8221;  No clue how that extra character ended up in there. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanagora.com/2009/06/sotomayor-a-good-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-10580</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanagora.com/?p=2407#comment-10580</guid>
		<description>My thoughts:

1. I think it is great that a Latina has been nominated.

2. I think this woman is vastly underqualified for the Supreme Court of the United States.

3. I would prefer not to see another Catholic on the Court; there are too many already.

4. I would prefer to see someone nominated that has not attended Yale, Harvard, or Standford.  Stevens is living proof that one can serve on the court, having not attended one of those three institutions and do a fine job on the bench.

5. I think she will be confirmed without much debate because she supports abortion rights and is the color and sex that is apparently desired for the Court.  This is a shame, in my opinion.

As always, it&#039;s great to see you post, Rosie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts:</p>
<p>1. I think it is great that a Latina has been nominated.</p>
<p>2. I think this woman is vastly underqualified for the Supreme Court of the United States.</p>
<p>3. I would prefer not to see another Catholic on the Court; there are too many already.</p>
<p>4. I would prefer to see someone nominated that has not attended Yale, Harvard, or Standford.  Stevens is living proof that one can serve on the court, having not attended one of those three institutions and do a fine job on the bench.</p>
<p>5. I think she will be confirmed without much debate because she supports abortion rights and is the color and sex that is apparently desired for the Court.  This is a shame, in my opinion.</p>
<p>As always, it&#8217;s great to see you post, Rosie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

